Match info
| Date | League | Winner | Loser | Score | Type | |||||
| 2003-08-18 | STA Bronze | TFCC | Team Fortress Community College | 113.22 +3.58 |
AC | Aristo Crack | 99.74 -3.58 |
30-0  0-0 | Arise Arise |
|
Writeup:
TFCC over AC
Well we know that in general this map is VERY D friendly. So in order to cap you have to have some help.
Rd1: TFCC's defense was fairly rock solid, only allowing a touch or two for the entire round, While the TFCC offense was steadily making some headway and bringing home the occasional cap. Having some Offensive engineer work by Knock helped and in the end it was 30-0 for TFCC.
ON to Rd2: RD2 was more like we expected. Not many touches and even less caps. In fact no caps for either team. It appears that AC patch up a few holes in the defense and held the TFCC offense to no caps. GG to AC for the adjustment. RD2: 0-0
Just like to say that this map next week is going to end up in a lot of 0-0 scores, might want to consider changing it.
Comments
|
|
|
|
-AC-FRUITYBOY
68.41.128.52 |
Nice offensive runs rd1, TFCC. Not that I am anyone, but I was very impressed. You frustrated my offense both rds, which, in my opinion, is tough to do.
Much respect.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
KnockKnock
216.160.170.53 |
GG
Thanx for taking care of Mr. Respawn Piper internally, and tell him that if really thinks Bookrat hacks, he can come and get the HLTV anytime.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
[TFCC]MontyBurn
s 12.207.18.162 |
Looking at the chat in logs shows why FRUITYBOY is an excellent leader. gj FRUITYBOY
gg -AC-
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Vanquish
142.227.152.193 |
hehe I was the 'respawn piper'. I wasn't actually piping the respawn as I was delaying your D soldier from getting back into position above the tubes, I didn't once fire at your offense whereas they felt the need to shoot back...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
KnockKnock
68.71.55.153 |
right, let me go get the logs (sorry, but i hate it when people blatently lie)
ok...
-AC-Vanquish(TEAM): I piped their spawn killing their D
also this
-AC-Vanquish(TEAM): fru I definately want HLTV of this, bookrat is very fucking suspiciou8s
but you never came to get the hltv...
I also though this was funny
-AC-Vanquish(TEAM): dual hws + dual sgs = fucking gay
considering you went to the same defense after we capped 3 times...maybe you're just bitter you didnt think about earlier?
-AC-Vanquish(TEAM): ok going sniper
that was funny too considering your leader tell you no about 20 times and you do it anyway.
Its people like you Vanq that can give a good clan a bad name, Id hate to have to see this happen to AC because of one llama player.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
[TFCC]Bookrat
142.165.10.67 |
Having practiced the map several times -- and having just played it in CAL -- we knew what to expect and were able to get the caps early.
Follow this URL link to read TFCC's complete writeup for this match: http://tfcc.proceed.net/?showentry=349
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Vanquish
142.177.219.130 |
Just seeing this now...
I'd love to know how I 'blatently lied' in that. You know my opinion of you from the logs. No where did I say I killed offense just as nowhere did you claim I killed offense. I piped your spawn to keep the tubes clear for out O to get through, and I did it all of 3 times (if I remember correctly). And really, any team that needs 2 heavies and an SG on a D oriented map deserves all the flames coming their way, because then you're obviously playing for the selfish win at the cost of the opposing offense's night of fun. We go into matches planning on using an 'acceptable D' (1 HW max usually with an SG in the flag room) to keep the game fun for offenses, but if the opposing clan doesn't grant us the same grace, we'll fight tooth an nail with a lame strategy just as our opponents do. I guess its anything for a win though....
And chat logs don't prove much, for all we know you were saying the same things over voice comms so we wouldn't know either, although I doubt it. Just a little FYI though, our entire offense was suspicious of bookrat and complaining about lame D, the rest were just doing it over voicecomms, so if you think I'm 'a llama player giving a good clan a bad name', you'd best re-evaluate your opinion of me. Anyone who knows me knows I'm the type who cares more about having fun and keeping the game fun for others than winning (old TPF member, IGL Q spectating admin, very fair server admin for a very popular, but now defunt 2fort server, and I generally try to help anyone with any problem they have). Loosing to a clan you know you can beat (ran a new guy and had to use 2 replacements during this match) because they use a lame D strategy on a very D oriented map is something to tick off any offense, so you really shouldn't be surprised at my opinion, and our entire offense's opinions at all.
Also, I went sniper because I like to snipe, I'm fairly good at it (though you'd never know from that match, I pinged so damned high I'd of been lucky to hit anything with the assault cannon let alone a sniper rifle) but I am never allowed to try it in a clan match, with 2 minutes left being down by 3 on a map like that I figured I'd have at least SOME fun in the match...
Sorry if I appear bitter, but if you cannot understand my feelings or see it from my point of view, you've got no right to call me a llama player.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Jer
67.69.58.192 |
Bookrat has cooties
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
ADmin01
68.102.239.222 |
^^
|
| |
|





