Deprecated: The behavior of unparenthesized expressions containing both '.' and '+'/'-' will change in PHP 8: '+'/'-' will take a higher precedence in /home/konspir/public_html/forums/includes/class_core.php on line 3502
Konspiracy.org

Match info

Date League Winner Loser Score Type
2003-08-18 STA Bronze TFCC Team Fortress Community College 113.22 
 +3.58
AC Aristo Crack 99.74 
 -3.58
30-0 
0-0
Arise
Arise
Regular

Writeup:

TFCC over AC

Well we know that in general this map is VERY D friendly. So in order to cap you have to have some help.

Rd1: TFCC's defense was fairly rock solid, only allowing a touch or two for the entire round, While the TFCC offense was steadily making some headway and bringing home the occasional cap. Having some Offensive engineer work by Knock helped and in the end it was 30-0 for TFCC.

ON to Rd2: RD2 was more like we expected. Not many touches and even less caps. In fact no caps for either team. It appears that AC patch up a few holes in the defense and held the TFCC offense to no caps. GG to AC for the adjustment. RD2: 0-0

Just like to say that this map next week is going to end up in a lot of 0-0 scores, might want to consider changing it.



Comments

Old
-AC-FRUITYBOY
68.41.128.52
Nice offensive runs rd1, TFCC. Not that I am anyone, but I was very impressed. You frustrated my offense both rds, which, in my opinion, is tough to do. Much respect.
 
Old
KnockKnock
216.160.170.53
GG Thanx for taking care of Mr. Respawn Piper internally, and tell him that if really thinks Bookrat hacks, he can come and get the HLTV anytime.
 
Old
[TFCC]MontyBurn
s

12.207.18.162
Looking at the chat in logs shows why FRUITYBOY is an excellent leader. gj FRUITYBOY gg -AC-
 
Old
Vanquish
142.227.152.193
hehe I was the 'respawn piper'. I wasn't actually piping the respawn as I was delaying your D soldier from getting back into position above the tubes, I didn't once fire at your offense whereas they felt the need to shoot back...
 
Old
KnockKnock
68.71.55.153
right, let me go get the logs (sorry, but i hate it when people blatently lie) ok... -AC-Vanquish(TEAM): I piped their spawn killing their D also this -AC-Vanquish(TEAM): fru I definately want HLTV of this, bookrat is very fucking suspiciou8s but you never came to get the hltv... I also though this was funny -AC-Vanquish(TEAM): dual hws + dual sgs = fucking gay considering you went to the same defense after we capped 3 times...maybe you're just bitter you didnt think about earlier? -AC-Vanquish(TEAM): ok going sniper that was funny too considering your leader tell you no about 20 times and you do it anyway. Its people like you Vanq that can give a good clan a bad name, Id hate to have to see this happen to AC because of one llama player.
 
Old
[TFCC]Bookrat
142.165.10.67
Having practiced the map several times -- and having just played it in CAL -- we knew what to expect and were able to get the caps early. Follow this URL link to read TFCC's complete writeup for this match: http://tfcc.proceed.net/?showentry=349
 
Old
Vanquish
142.177.219.130
Just seeing this now... I'd love to know how I 'blatently lied' in that. You know my opinion of you from the logs. No where did I say I killed offense just as nowhere did you claim I killed offense. I piped your spawn to keep the tubes clear for out O to get through, and I did it all of 3 times (if I remember correctly). And really, any team that needs 2 heavies and an SG on a D oriented map deserves all the flames coming their way, because then you're obviously playing for the selfish win at the cost of the opposing offense's night of fun. We go into matches planning on using an 'acceptable D' (1 HW max usually with an SG in the flag room) to keep the game fun for offenses, but if the opposing clan doesn't grant us the same grace, we'll fight tooth an nail with a lame strategy just as our opponents do. I guess its anything for a win though.... And chat logs don't prove much, for all we know you were saying the same things over voice comms so we wouldn't know either, although I doubt it. Just a little FYI though, our entire offense was suspicious of bookrat and complaining about lame D, the rest were just doing it over voicecomms, so if you think I'm 'a llama player giving a good clan a bad name', you'd best re-evaluate your opinion of me. Anyone who knows me knows I'm the type who cares more about having fun and keeping the game fun for others than winning (old TPF member, IGL Q spectating admin, very fair server admin for a very popular, but now defunt 2fort server, and I generally try to help anyone with any problem they have). Loosing to a clan you know you can beat (ran a new guy and had to use 2 replacements during this match) because they use a lame D strategy on a very D oriented map is something to tick off any offense, so you really shouldn't be surprised at my opinion, and our entire offense's opinions at all. Also, I went sniper because I like to snipe, I'm fairly good at it (though you'd never know from that match, I pinged so damned high I'd of been lucky to hit anything with the assault cannon let alone a sniper rifle) but I am never allowed to try it in a clan match, with 2 minutes left being down by 3 on a map like that I figured I'd have at least SOME fun in the match... Sorry if I appear bitter, but if you cannot understand my feelings or see it from my point of view, you've got no right to call me a llama player.
 
Old
Jer
67.69.58.192
Bookrat has cooties
 
Old
ADmin01
68.102.239.222
^^
 


Add a comment

Comment:

You must be logged in to post comments.

Konspiracy v4.0 - Code, images and content © 1999-2005 by Konspiracy.org. All rights reserved. Terms of use [ 0.0185ms ]
top of page