Match info
| Date | League | Winner | Loser | Score | Type | |||||
| 2005-01-03 | STA Bronze | TNT | The Nameless Team | 64.00 +2.28 |
3Q | Equilibrium | 48.76 -2.28 |
80-30 0-10 | Security_r Security_r |
|
Writeup:
TNT over 3Q
man...'05 -- and still this horrible. we should have started with a new map in the new year! that would have been awesome (ed: uhmm...wtf does it matter? get to the point and stop yapping)
r1: good use of the generator. our local NG expert, nemesis, lets me know that 3q's demo used about 2 detpacks for each sucessful detonation. had this been a friendly match, he would have lectured in room 301 about proper detpack placement, but since this was a match -- the lecture was cancelled. good concs on 3q's side! in the end though...tnt achieved victory.
r2: this round was very special and i made some good avi material. 3q capped the only flag in this round that was preceded by the longest attempt to get the flag into the home base in tfc history. btw: crak gets the mvp award for killing 101 equilibrium dudes with his bare fists...err...something like that
AND...we made babies!
p.s.: 8 (tnt) vs 9 (3q) both rounds
Comments
|
|
|
-:3Q:-Atticus
68.189.101.10 |
I love how you guys left out the part that you played with two HWguys round1. Good game though, nicely played other than the round1 hwguys and round2 sniper...other than that great job tnt good game!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
johnyBravo
68.189.101.10 |
uhmm...what does it matter? if nobody complained in round 1, then there is nothing to talk about it. STA did not post anything official about it on the website. there is absolutely no point to drag stuff like that into a write-up. the writer made a good choice.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
blasphemous
68.189.101.10 |
bravo has no idea what he is talking about -- stuff like that should be mentioned!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
johnyBravo
68.189.101.10 |
if you don't shut your trap...i will shut you up! awesome write up! no need to taint it with things that don't matter
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
blasphemous
68.189.101.10 |
you're weird
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
johnyBravo
68.189.101.10 |
yup
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
[TNT] Peat
68.189.101.10 |
seriously...back in december, most everyone played with 2 hdub's and most clans this week probably had no idea about this either and _still_ played with 2 hdub's -- think about it. if they did not get the message from STA directly in IRC, then there is no reason to cry wolf
cave canum
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Exe
198.161.94.253 |
post by sta on dec 22nd indicated that only 1 hw will be allowed on security_r - hmmm...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Skull
70.185.2.6 |
Ignorance is not an excuse, it is obvious that neither the leaders or any of you piss-monkeys actually took the time to re-read the rulesa and double check what you should already know...
p.s.: 8 (tnt) vs 9 (3q) both rounds who is tainting who?
gg rd2
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DarkLight
209.6.167.50 |
BW, thanks for the tip about the detpack placement but its actually a bug with steam....
Sometimes if the demo dies before the detpack goes off or the detpack kills the demoman it wont trigger the generator. Same in bases2k3 computer. So THATS why the dets wernt successful not because of detpack placement. But thanks for the kind words
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
zor
68.201.237.142 |
can anyone please show me where exactly you see a rule on sta's rules page that 2hw's aren't allowed in 9v9 play?
I have read the rules.. I have watched the news posts... I have looked at the captains' forum. I see nothing official. That "post" on the 22nd that Exe mentiones is by Jester, not an STA admin--thus, unofficial. The poll ongoing in the captains forum is for division ruling, not specific map rules.
We do know the rules, thank you very much, and we play by them each week. Feel free to dispute if you think otherwise.
Aside from that, gg.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
DarkLight
209.6.167.50 |
Well it USED to say this on the rules page (as of two hours ago STA removed it because they didnt feel like enforcing their own rules):
? Bronze:
a: 2x30 (default)
b: TP11 (default)
c: 8on8 or 9on9 (depending on map)
d: Caps only (default)
e. HW guy limit of 1 for all maps except command point maps.
as you know security is not a command point map therefore hw limit was 1.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
burninhell
66.24.225.31 |
my clan played with 0 hws. you should've played us.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
TeH.Atticus
63.193.153.27 |
TeH.Atticus > -:3Q:-Atticus
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
-:3Q:-Atticus
68.189.101.10 |
lol... TeH.Atticus go bother someone else named Atticus. :P
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Mav
12.218.180.61 |
Division Settings(all)
a: 2x30 (default)
b: TP11 (default)
c: 9vs9 (default), 8vs8, 10vs10 (map specific)
d. Caps only (default)
e. Class limits-HW one (2 on 10vs10)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
LordWhORe
24.21.129.219 |
it was posted way to late to be bitching about it khr didnt know till the day befor , we found out in a scrim with io and guess what they bitched just as much as the rest of these idiots .l.... honestly is there anything else you would like limited lets compleatly delete scout too becasue they run with the flag too fast ffs stop blaming 2 hws on your loss when its probally cause you just suck GO TNT :)
ps i think 2 hws if fine and i play offence :P
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Moon-Guardian
24.159.205.81 |
Its two hws. conc past them, conc them. Jesus, you must suck.
GJ TnT
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
-:3Q:-Atticus
68.189.101.10 |
Moon...get the hell out of our section. Go whine somewhere else, learn to type TNT's tag right. Freaking retard...
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
LordWhORe
24.21.129.219 |
the good thing about KSE is everyones section is everyones section and you dont get banned for flames here like you do in cats TNT are good peoples so deal with it
|
| |
|
|
January 17, 2005, 5:50 pm |
|
|
hahah
man you guys are funny
ps. hi balinor i love you
|
|
| |
|
