Match info

Date League Winner Loser Score Type
2005-06-30 TFL 1a TDA Tap Dat Ass 1914.67 
 +53.15
EA Eternal Animosity 286.94 
 -8.38
60-50 
90-30
2fort
2fort
Defend

Writeup:

TDA over EA

Seph and azn played! blast from the past, jk <3 azn and seph

gg EA



Comments

Old July 1, 2005, 1:50 pm
Lineage2 own me and aznravens face..but we had to come back for 2fort! It seems i can no longer rocket jump :~(, but i had fun none the less.
 
Old July 1, 2005, 4:37 pm
~A~

Grats on the CE streak
 
Old July 1, 2005, 7:01 pm
CE's streak is 34, they've won 30.
 
Old July 1, 2005, 7:21 pm
31
 
Old July 1, 2005, 7:24 pm
they'll get to 34 with no problems nj lats night btw
 
Old July 3, 2005, 3:31 am
29 in my book, those to 1/4 matches for no balls noK are not matches, they should be dropped. Nonetheless, with the lack of caliber teams in TFC now, I expect TDA to keep winning for as long as they wish too.
 
Old July 3, 2005, 4:24 am
Because if you play TFC....you have balls.
 
Old July 3, 2005, 5:09 am
How about the fact that like we've had to go through 8 or 9 forfeits :) because people are dicks
 
Old July 3, 2005, 8:08 am
Blashy, what the hell are you thinking, honestly. Those "forfeits" in your book against teams like noK...noK plays one round 9v9 and gets their shit ruined so they REFUSE to play round two...that's MORE than a win. That's embarassing them so bad they can't even stand to compete another 30 minutes. That's not a forfeit, otherwise a hell of a lot more clans would do that.
 
Old July 4, 2005, 12:55 am
You went through 8 or 9 forfiets because people are dicks..?
 
Old July 4, 2005, 5:50 am
The last bastion of hope at averting this tragedy has been destroyed. Oh, the drama.
 
Old July 4, 2005, 7:44 am
mexi, they did not even play half of 1 round in a match. I don't call that a match. And your statement is inacurate. You could say that if a team decided to not show up at all because they admit they do not wish to be thrashed, well that should count as a win because of intimidation? Look I have no doubt TDA will get a 40+ game win streak with the calibre they are facing, but IMHO, 2 of the current matches should be removed.
 
Old July 4, 2005, 7:51 am
mexi, here is a better example. Zodiac Braves were #2 in OGL behind #1 CE, they did not challenge CE for the #1 spot EVER. They did not want to face them, they were almost unbeatable at #2 but knew CE was out of their league. Everytime CE was open for a challenge, ZB never challenged. This was admitted by the clan itself. So from your logic CE should get 10+ wins out of "intimidation".
 
Old July 4, 2005, 1:33 pm
No Blashy, that's not his logic. His logic is that we actually did play a round and then they forfeited. They never forfeited before the match even started because they knew they were going to lose. The 8 or 9 forfeits that TDA has gotten during the win streak hasn't counted, because no TFC has been played. They are 2 different situations. One had a full round of TFC be played and then the clan decided they didn't want to play anymore. The other has the clan not even challenge/show up.
 
Old July 4, 2005, 4:06 pm
I agree with ED's logic Plus his wife is hot :-D
 
Old July 5, 2005, 2:04 am
yes headshot, they were dicks
 
Old July 5, 2005, 4:41 pm
I agree with mexi.... WOW, I have to soak that in. Not sure thats ever happened before. I understand a straight up forfeit not counting (which is correct), but to show, play one round or part of a round, then decide a forfeit is better than a loss... Well, that should count as a win for TDA. Both showed for the match, TDA was pounding them, its pretty easy to see what the result were going to be even if they stayed.
 
Old July 6, 2005, 6:41 am
Blashy IS STEAMING
 
Old July 6, 2005, 8:57 pm
Wow Blashy, stfu about nok already cheater
 
Old July 7, 2005, 1:44 pm
Omg, the first time I've trolled these forums in over two years but it was definately fun playing in a match again. I hope to do so more often...
 
Old July 8, 2005, 5:08 am
i believe he is just calling it as it is, office.
 


Add a comment

Comment:

You must be logged in to post comments.

Konspiracy v4.0 - Code, images and content © 1999-2005 by Konspiracy.org. All rights reserved. Terms of use [ 0.0198ms ]
top of page